WOMEN:
THE FORGOTTEN CHILD MURDERERS
Women who kill their children are given sympathy and sentenced to "treatment" while men who do the same thing are charged with murder and sentenced to life.
Perhaps it is not a coincidence that women are many times more likely to murder their offspring than men. More ..
Our Most Popular Web Page
Female Sex Offenders
Female Sexual Predators
Hundreds of them.... female teachers who sexually assaulted 12 year old boys. Read about a lesbian tennis coach who sexually assaulted her 13 year old female student.
Read how a 40 year old female sexual predator blamed a 7 year old boy whom she claimed was " coming on to me" and whom she "hoped to marry someday." More..

Non-dad on hook for child support
Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, By TONY BLAIS, SUN MEDIA
EDMONTON -- An Edmonton judge has decided a divorced dad has to make child support payments, even though the child isn't his. Justin Sumner had an on-again-off-again relationship with the woman he eventually married, Dawn Sumner.
She already had a child from a previous relationship with a man named Rob Duncan, and as she and Justin broke up and reunited, Dawn was sexually involved with both men.
When she found she was pregnant, she called Justin, who recognized there was a possibility that Duncan was the father, but later concluded he was the dad.
When Rhylee was born, Justin was registered as her father, and the Sumners later wed the day before Rhylee's first birthday.
After the couple separated in 2003, and divorced in December 2004, Justin sought primary custody of the child.
However, after learning, via DNA tests, that Rhylee wasn't his, Justin sought to have support payments terminated.
In his decision, Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sterling Sanderman wrote Duncan avoided his obligations, and Dawn is prepared to relieve him from responsibility because Justin has more money.
"Although she adopts a rather practical solution from her perspective, it is crass and opportunistic," said the judge, who accused all three of ignoring Rhylee's best interests.
Sanderman ruled Justin must keep paying support, because case law dictates that once a person has made a commitment to stand in the place of a parent, that person must continue to do so if capable.
But Sanderman ruled Justin's payments should be cut in half and Duncan should share the obligation.
