WOMEN:
THE FORGOTTEN CHILD MURDERERS
Women who kill their children are given sympathy and sentenced to "treatment" while men who do the same thing are charged with murder and sentenced to life.
Perhaps it is not a coincidence that women are many times more likely to murder their offspring than men. More ..
Our Most Popular Web Page
Female Sex Offenders
Female Sexual Predators
Hundreds of them.... female teachers who sexually assaulted 12 year old boys. Read about a lesbian tennis coach who sexually assaulted her 13 year old female student.
Read how a 40 year old female sexual predator blamed a 7 year old boy whom she claimed was " coming on to me" and whom she "hoped to marry someday." More..
Supreme Court of Canada Decision - Press Release
"The Baby Naming Case"

Supreme Court of Canada
Cour suprême du Canada
Press release - June 6, 2003
28726
Darrell Wayne Trociuk - v. - Attorney General of British Columbia, the Director of Vital Statistics and Reni Ernst (B.C.) 2003 SCC 34 / 2003 CSC 34
Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour, LeBel and Deschamps JJ.
The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA025972, dated May 23, 2001, heard on December 4, 2002 is allowed with costs throughout. The declaration of invalidity with respect to ss. 3(1)(b) and 3(6)(b) will be suspended for a period of 12 months. If the constitutional defect has not been remedied at that time, the provisions will be of no force and effect by operation of s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
The constitutional questions are answered as follows:
Question 1: Do ss. 3(1)(b) and 3(6)(b) of the British Columbia Vital Statistics Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 479, on their own or in their effect, discriminate against biological fathers on the basis of sex, by providing biological mothers with sole discretion to include or exclude information relating to biological fathers when registering the birth of a child, contrary to s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
Answer: Yes.
Question 2: If question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the discrimination a reasonable limit prescribed by law which can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society under s. 1 of the Charter?
Answer: No.
L'appel interjeté contre l'arrêt de la Cour d'appel de la Colombie-Britannique (Vancouver), numéro CA025972, en date du 23 mai 2001, entendu le 4 décembre 2002 est accueilli avec dépens dans toutes les cours. La déclaration d'invalidité des al. 3(1)b) et 3(6)b) est suspendue pour 12 mois. Si l'inconstitutionnalité n'est pas corrige cette date, ces dispositions deviendront inopérantes en vertu de l'art. 52 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1982.
Les questions constitutionnelles reçoivent les réponses suivantes:
Question 1 : Les aliénas 3(1)b) et 3(6)b) de la Vital Statistics Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, ch. 479, constituent-ils, en violation du par. 15(1) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés, une discrimination fonde sur le sexe, contre les prées biologiques, en accordant aux seules mirés biologiques la faculté d'inclure ou d'exclure des renseignements sur les prées biologiques lorsqu' elles enregistrent la naissance d'un enfant?
Réponse: Oui.
Question 2: Si la réponse la question 1 est affirmative, la discrimination constitue-t-elle, suivant l' article premier de la Charte, une limite raisonnable prescrite par une règle de droit et dont la justification peut se démontrer dans le cadre d' une société libre et démocratique?
Réponse: Non.